Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

3x Nasdaq/Tech/Semis Trend with Short and VIX Switches vs 50/50 Hedged Rotation and TQQQ Dip-Buy

What they say: stated rules

Each rule is quoted from the strategy's own documents. Tap a ✓ to read the quote. Shared rules come first.

Rules stated

Hedge / defensive overlay: Bonds / Treasuries

—

Hedge / defensive overlay: Inverse / short exposure

—

Hedge / defensive overlay: Volatility products (VIX)

—

Leverage use

—

Trading signal

—

Trading signal: Trend (moving averages)

—

Every published figureShow 43 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

buy-the-dip, leveraged etfs, risk-on/risk-off, short/hedge capable, tactical allocation, tech/semis focus, trend-following, volatility hedge

leveraged etfs, macro regime, mean-reversion, sector rotation, tactical allocation, trend-following, volatility hedging

Asset classes / instruments

equities

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.21

—

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

2.92

—

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.57

—

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

40.87

—

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

32.68

—

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

56.39%

—

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

56.08%

—

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

$32.2B

—

Backtest regulatory fees

$31.6M

—

Backtest slippage cost

$305.4M

—

Returns

Backtest length

3,735

—

Out-of-sample length

576

—

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

174.77%

—

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

322056k%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

48.46%

3.62%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

147.12%

2.81%

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

-0.27%

—

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

12.87%

0.34%

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

-7.41%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

5.00%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

4.99%

86.44%

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

-2.83%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

-9.64%

0.95%

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

15.14%

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

2.63

—

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

0.75

331.36

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-66.54%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-64.41%

-0.01%

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.86

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

0.89

18.06

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

2.99

—

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.30

—

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

66.06%

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

83.62%

0.20%

Quality

Community review status

ACTIVE

—

Holdings

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

0.65

—

Construction

Logic complexity (node count)

392

—

Rebalance corridor width

4.00%

9.00%

Rebalance frequency

none

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

—

Watchers

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources