Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

80/20 RSP and SPY Equal-Weight Tilt vs Bogleheads Three-Fund Portfolio

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (OOS, Composite). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

0.0%

8.3%Best

11.6%

—

11.4%

9.8%Best

1.03

1.04Best

-7.8%Best

-14.1%

Fee

—

1.00%

Each source uses its own scale

—

2.58(0-5 (Quantbase))

Inception

—

2021-09-19

Holdings

—

40%

82%Best

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Bogleheads Three-Fund PortfolioCompositeup 48.3%
S&P 500 ETFup 79.1%

No published history to chart: 80/20 RSP and SPY Equal-Weight Tilt.

Every published figureShow 38 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

annual rebalance, diversification, equal-weight tilt, long-only, s&p 500, us equities

—

Asset classes / instruments

equities

—

Returns

Annual return (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

9.76%

Backtest end date (Quantbase data field)

—

2022-12-01

Return since chart start (cumulative) (client composite)

—

55.32%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

11.59%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

7.58%

—

Return, rolling 1 year (client composite)

—

8.32%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

0.19%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

0.00%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

0.91%

—

Cost & access

Brokerage / custodian

—

Alpaca

Management / advisory fee

—

1.00%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.48

—

Daily volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

0.62%

Max drawdown (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

-16.75%

Max drawdown over the chart range (client composite)

—

-14.14%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-7.81%

—

Monthly volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

2.90%

Sharpe ratio (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

2.69

Sharpe ratio from daily returns over the chart range (client composite)

—

1.04

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.03

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

11.37%

—

Volatility (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

0.03%

Volatility over the chart range, annualized from daily (×√252) (client composite)

—

9.84%

Market-relative

Correlation to SPY (full history) (client composite)

—

0.98

Correlation to SPY (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

0.98

Suitability

Experience minimum: bonds

—

Experience minimum: crypto

—

Experience minimum: equity

—

Experience minimum: leverage

—

Experience minimum: options

—

Construction

Last rebalance date

—

2026-08-22

Rebalance frequency

yearly

quarterly

Rebalancing (methodology text)

—

Quarterly

Disclosure

Metrics calculated through

—

2026-10-05

Risk score

Qualitative risk score (Quantbase data field)

—

2.25

Risk score 0-5 (Quantbase)

—

2.58

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources