Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

CAN SLIM Growth Leaders Equal-Weight Basket vs Quantum Computing Leaders Monthly Custom-Weighted

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (OOS, Model). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

0.0%

26.2%Best

63.5%Best

40.8%

23.7%

—

2.23

—

-7.7%Best

-33.2%

Minimum investment

—

$100

Each source uses its own scale

—

2.64(Surmount risk score)

Inception

—

2024-06-05

Holdings

—

40%

91%Best

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Quantum Computing Leaders Monthly Custom-WeightedModelup 177.9%
S&P 500 ETFup 42.9%

No published history to chart: CAN SLIM Growth Leaders Equal-Weight Basket.

Every published figureShow 22 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

can slim, daily rebalance, equal-weight, growth, momentum, rules-based, us equities

—

Asset classes / instruments

equities

equity

Returns

Annual return (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

40.78%

Return, 1 year (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

26.24%

Return, 3 months (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

9.76%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

63.53%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

15.09%

—

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

1.66%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

0.00%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

12.65%

—

Return, year to date (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

30.68%

Total return (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

449.20%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

8.27

—

Maximum drawdown (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

—

-33.23%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-7.68%

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

2.23

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

23.67%

—

Holdings

Industry weights (Surmount)

—

Technology: 74.0% · Industrials: 5.2% · Consumer Cyclical: 10.4% · Communication Services: 10.4%

Popularity

Investors following (Surmount)

—

Cost & access

Minimum investment

—

$100

Construction

Rebalance frequency

daily

—

Risk score

Risk score (Surmount)

—

2.64

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources