Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Class Warfare T-Mobile vs AT&T Volatility Basket Switch vs Top 10 Lobbying Spenders (Quiver Data)

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (OOS, Composite). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

62.1%Best

18.4%

41.5%

—

28.5%

13.0%Best

1.36Best

1.00

-30.9%

-18.3%Best

Fee

—

1.00%

Each source uses its own scale

—

2.86(0-5 (Quantbase))

Inception

2023-12-08

2022-08-10

Holdings

—

60%

64%Best

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Top 10 Lobbying Spenders (Quiver Data)Compositeup 64.8%
S&P 500 ETFup 79.1%

No published history to chart: Class Warfare T-Mobile vs AT&T Volatility Basket Switch.

Every published figureShow 65 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

daily rebalance, large-cap growth, leveraged etfs, tactical allocation, us equities, volatility signal

—

Asset classes / instruments

equities

—

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.04

—

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

1.63

—

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.88

—

Correlation to SPY (full history) (client composite)

—

0.88

Correlation to SPY (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

0.88

Returns

Annual return (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

12.90%

Backtest end date (Quantbase data field)

—

2023-02-01

Backtest length

3,153

—

Out-of-sample length

710

—

Return since chart start (cumulative) (client composite)

—

69.56%

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

33.27%

—

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

3539%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

41.52%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

166.41%

—

Return, rolling 1 year (client composite)

—

18.43%

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

0.65%

—

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

9.08%

—

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

2.01%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

62.09%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

62.09%

—

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

0.77%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

4.64%

—

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

14.07%

—

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

24.78

—

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

30.17

—

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

55.60%

—

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

54.37%

—

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

$364k

—

Backtest regulatory fees

$836

—

Backtest slippage cost

$6,351

—

Cost & access

Brokerage / custodian

—

Alpaca

Management / advisory fee

—

1.00%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.89

—

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.34

—

Daily volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

0.82%

Max drawdown over the chart range (client composite)

—

-18.33%

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-37.51%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-30.94%

—

Monthly volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

3.37%

Sharpe ratio from daily returns over the chart range (client composite)

—

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.09

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.36

—

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.58

—

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

2.13

—

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

30.77%

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

28.46%

—

Volatility over the chart range, annualized from daily (×√252) (client composite)

—

13.02%

Quality

Community review status

ACTIVE

—

Holdings

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

0.25

—

Suitability

Experience minimum: bonds

—

Experience minimum: crypto

—

Experience minimum: equity

—

Experience minimum: leverage

—

Experience minimum: options

—

Construction

Last rebalance date

—

2026-10-01

Logic complexity (node count)

—

Rebalance frequency

daily

weekly

Disclosure

Metrics calculated through

—

2026-10-05

Identity

Partner (Quantbase data field)

—

quiverquant

Risk score

Qualitative risk score (Quantbase data field)

—

3.75

Risk score 0-5 (Quantbase)

—

2.86

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

—

Watchers

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources