Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Conservative Sector Rotation with Treasury/KMLM Fallback vs Ray Dalio All Weather Portfolio

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (OOS, Composite). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

29.8%Best

-1.9%

26.1%

—

10.3%

7.3%Best

2.32Best

0.56

-4.2%Best

-11.2%

Fee

—

1.00%

Each source uses its own scale

—

2.09(0-5 (Quantbase))

Inception

—

2021-09-19

Holdings

—

40%

82%Best

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Ray Dalio All Weather PortfolioCompositeup 22.1%
S&P 500 ETFup 78.3%

No published history to chart: Conservative Sector Rotation with Treasury/KMLM Fallback.

Every published figureShow 37 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

bonds, daily rebalance, defensive sectors, inverse hedges, leveraged etfs, managed futures, risk management, sector rotation

—

Asset classes / instruments

equities

—

Returns

Annual return (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

3.83%

Backtest end date (Quantbase data field)

—

2022-11-01

Return since chart start (cumulative) (client composite)

—

19.51%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

26.09%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

18.12%

—

Return, rolling 1 year (client composite)

—

-1.94%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

0.72%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

29.77%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

0.56%

—

Cost & access

Brokerage / custodian

—

Alpaca

Management / advisory fee

—

1.00%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

6.18

—

Daily volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

0.46%

Max drawdown (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

-8.34%

Max drawdown over the chart range (client composite)

—

-11.18%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-4.22%

—

Monthly volatility over the chart range (client composite)

—

2.88%

Sharpe ratio (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

4.72

Sharpe ratio from daily returns over the chart range (client composite)

—

0.56

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

2.32

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

10.26%

—

Volatility (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

0.02%

Volatility over the chart range, annualized from daily (×√252) (client composite)

—

7.30%

Market-relative

Correlation to SPY (full history) (client composite)

—

0.48

Correlation to SPY (Quantbase data field) (basis not stated)

—

0.48

Suitability

Experience minimum: bonds

—

Experience minimum: crypto

—

Experience minimum: equity

—

Experience minimum: leverage

—

Experience minimum: options

—

Construction

Last rebalance date

—

2026-08-08

Rebalance frequency

daily

quarterly

Disclosure

Metrics calculated through

—

2026-10-04

Risk score

Qualitative risk score (Quantbase data field)

—

1.50

Risk score 0-5 (Quantbase)

—

2.09

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources