Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Green Solutions Impact & Sustainable Finance Thematic vs Top-3 Momentum in AI Chips, Nuclear and Defense Stocks

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (Live, OOS). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

—

0.0%

—

123.1%

—

28.5%

—

3.01

—

-6.0%

Fee

0.20%

—

Minimum investment

$100

—

Each source uses its own scale

4(1-5 (Interactive Advisors))

—

Inception

2026-10-06

—

82%Best

40%

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Green Solutions Impact & Sustainable Finance ThematicLivedown -1.4%
S&P 500 ETFdown -2.0%

No published history to chart: Top-3 Momentum in AI Chips, Nuclear and Defense Stocks.

Every published figureShow 25 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

—

ai chips, equal-weight, momentum rotation, nuclear power, space/defense, thematic equities, top-3 selection

Asset classes / instruments

equities

Composition (ETFs / Stocks / Mixed)

STOCKS

—

ESG / responsible flag

—

Smart beta flag

—

Theme keywords (Interactive Advisors)

Impact investing, Green bonds, ESG investments, Sustainable finance

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

20.62

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

-5.97%

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

3.01

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

28.54%

Cost & access

Management / advisory fee

0.20%

—

Minimum investment

$100

—

Disclosure

Metrics calculated through

2026-10-09

—

Construction

Rebalance corridor width

—

8.00%

Rebalance frequency

—

none

Rebalancing (methodology text)

rebalanced quarterly

—

Returns

Return since inception (cumulative) (live account)

0.20%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

—

123.10%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

—

18.76%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

—

8.35%

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

—

0.00%

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

—

0.00%

Return, year to date (live account)

0.20%

—

Risk score

Risk label (Interactive Advisors)

Aggressive

—

Risk score 1-5 (Interactive Advisors)

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources