Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Inverse ETF Pop-Fade Using Bond vs PSQ RSI vs 50/50 Hedged Rotation and TQQQ Dip-Buy

What they say: stated rules

Each rule is quoted from the strategy's own documents. Tap a ✓ to read the quote. Shared rules come first.

Rules stated

Hedge / defensive overlay: Cash / T-bills

—

Leverage use

—

Rebalance schedule

—

Trading signal: Drawdown / loss from peak

—

Trading signal: Relative strength vs another asset

—

Trading signal: RSI overbought / oversold

—

Trading signal: Trend (moving averages)

—

Every published figureShow 43 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

daily rebalance, inverse etfs, leveraged, mean reversion, risk-on/off, rsi, volatility filter

leveraged etfs, macro regime, mean-reversion, sector rotation, tactical allocation, trend-following, volatility hedging

Asset classes / instruments

equities

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.35

—

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

-0.48

—

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

-0.29

—

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

56.32

—

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

56.81

—

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

56.98%

—

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

60.69%

—

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

$217k

—

Backtest regulatory fees

$908

—

Backtest slippage cost

$7,180

—

Returns

Backtest length

1,425

—

Out-of-sample length

641

—

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

72.23%

—

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

2068%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

25.86%

3.62%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

79.67%

2.81%

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

0.04%

—

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

7.97%

0.34%

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

-4.01%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

8.55%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

8.55%

86.44%

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

3.55%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

26.38%

0.95%

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

14.65%

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.83

—

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

0.90

331.36

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-39.51%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-28.72%

-0.01%

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.70

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.00

18.06

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

2.87

—

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.64

—

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

35.66%

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

26.37%

0.20%

Quality

Community review status

ACTIVE

—

Holdings

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

0.85

—

Construction

Logic complexity (node count)

116

—

Rebalance corridor width

—

9.00%

Rebalance frequency

daily

none

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

—

Watchers

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources