Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Latin America vs Asia-Pacific Momentum Switch vs Equity, Commodity, EM, Bond Rotator with Leveraged ETFs

What they hold

The latest holdings each source publishes. Simulated holdings come from a backtest; a stated mix is a target from the strategy's documents.

as of 2026-10-19

as of 2026-10-11

Asset mix

ETFs 100%

Top 5 holdings

ILF100.0%

SPY83.3%
TMF16.7%

Overlap

The share of portfolio weight two strategies hold in common (strategies with published holdings).

	Latin America vs Asia-Pacific Momentum Switch	Equity, Commodity, EM, Bond Rotator with Leveraged ETFs
Latin America vs Asia-Pacific Momentum Switch		0%
Equity, Commodity, EM, Bond Rotator with Leveraged ETFs	0%

Every published figureShow 42 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

asia-pacific, daily rebalance, equities, etfs, latin america, momentum, regional rotation, relative strength

daily rebalance, leveraged/inverse etfs, momentum and trend, multi-asset, tactical allocation

Asset classes / instruments

equities

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.08

0.52

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.75

0.24

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.60

0.15

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

18.19

49.56

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

24.75

49.23

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

52.70%

59.44%

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

54.11%

58.06%

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

$30k

$165k

Backtest regulatory fees

$97

$424

Backtest slippage cost

$692

$3,182

Returns

Backtest length

3,076

1,600

Out-of-sample length

499

360

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

9.51%

55.51%

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

203.32%

1553%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

21.40%

74.58%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

46.24%

122.15%

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

0.78%

0.56%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

5.38%

3.32%

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

-1.88%

1.24%

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

26.72%

87.79%

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

31.91%

87.80%

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

-0.98%

0.81%

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

4.80%

15.58%

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

13.62%

17.66%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.26

2.92

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.42

6.99

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-37.12%

-18.98%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-15.05%

-10.67%

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.53

2.24

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.03

2.82

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.75

3.64

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.49

4.89

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

21.72%

20.65%

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

20.89%

20.58%

Quality

Community review status

ACTIVE

Holdings

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

0.43

Construction

Logic complexity (node count)

405

Rebalance frequency

daily

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

152

Watchers

116

Latin America vs Asia-Pacific Momentum Switch

Equity, Commodity, EM, Bond Rotator with Leveraged ETFs

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Overlap

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Overlap

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources