Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Quantum Computing Leaders Monthly Custom-Weighted vs CAN SLIM Growth Leaders Equal-Weight Basket

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (Model, OOS). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

26.2%Best

0.0%

40.8%

63.5%Best

—

23.7%

—

2.23

-33.2%

-7.7%Best

Minimum investment

$100

—

Each source uses its own scale

2.64(Surmount risk score)

—

Inception

2024-06-05

—

Holdings

—

91%Best

40%

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Quantum Computing Leaders Monthly Custom-WeightedModelup 177.9%
S&P 500 ETFup 42.9%

No published history to chart: CAN SLIM Growth Leaders Equal-Weight Basket.

Every published figureShow 22 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

—

can slim, daily rebalance, equal-weight, growth, momentum, rules-based, us equities

Asset classes / instruments

equity

equities

Returns

Annual return (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

40.78%

—

Return, 1 year (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

26.24%

—

Return, 3 months (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

9.76%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

—

63.53%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

—

15.09%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

—

1.66%

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

—

0.00%

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

—

12.65%

Return, year to date (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

30.68%

—

Total return (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

449.20%

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

8.27

Maximum drawdown (Surmount tracking) (model tracking)

-33.23%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

-7.68%

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

2.23

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

23.67%

Holdings

Industry weights (Surmount)

Technology: 74.0% · Industrials: 5.2% · Consumer Cyclical: 10.4% · Communication Services: 10.4%

—

Popularity

Investors following (Surmount)

—

Cost & access

Minimum investment

$100

—

Construction

Rebalance frequency

—

daily

Risk score

Risk score (Surmount)

2.64

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources