Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Sustainable Moderately Aggressive Allocation (IRA) vs Women-Led US Companies Momentum with Volatility Weighting

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (Composite, OOS). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

16.5%

20.7%Best

10.4%

28.3%Best

—

23.3%

—

1.19

—

-25.4%

Fee

0.25%

—

Minimum investment

$50

—

Each source uses its own scale

4(1-5 risk profile (SoFi))

—

Inception

2024-12-01

2024-11-26

Holdings

73%

80%Best

What they say: stated rules

Each rule is quoted from the strategy's own documents. Tap a ✓ to read the quote. Shared rules come first.

Rules stated

Allocation target: Bonds / Treasuries

—

Allocation target: Equities

—

Include screen: ESG (general) · BlackRock

—

Number of holdings

—

Rebalance schedule

—

Trading signal: Momentum

—

Universe / index

—

Weighting scheme

—

What they hold

The latest holdings each source publishes. Simulated holdings come from a backtest; a stated mix is a target from the strategy's documents.

as of 2026-04-01

as of 2026-10-19

Asset mix

ETFs 99% · Cash 1%

Stocks 100%

Top 5 holdings

LCTU27.0%
DSI16.0%
USXF12.0%
DMXF9.0%
EUSB8.0%
of 11 positions

NOC10.5%
CLX10.2%
ORCL10.2%
BBY10.1%
ACN10.1%
of 11 positions

Overlap

The share of portfolio weight two strategies hold in common (strategies with published holdings).

	Sustainable Moderately Aggressive Allocation (IRA)	Women-Led US Companies Momentum with Volatility Weighting
Sustainable Moderately Aggressive Allocation (IRA)		0%
Women-Led US Companies Momentum with Volatility Weighting	0%

Every published figureShow 57 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

—

equities, multi-sector, risk-managed, volatility targeting, weekly rebalance, women-led companies

Asset classes / instruments

equity, fixed income

equities

ESG / responsible flag

Yes

—

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

—

0.09

Benchmark (methodology text)

Committee compares against "static benchmarks for each strategy" (not named)

—

Benchmark return, 1 year

16.64%

—

Benchmark return, since inception (annualized)

11.26%

—

Benchmark return, year to date

-2.83%

—

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

—

1.15

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

—

0.83

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

—

8.39

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

8.85

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

—

54.58%

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

54.33%

Holdings

Asset-class allocation

cash: 1.0% · bonds: 16.0% · stocks: 83.0%

—

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

—

0.10

Equity allocation

83.00%

—

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

—

$130k

Backtest regulatory fees

—

$96

Backtest slippage cost

—

$732

Returns

Backtest length

—

2,838

Out-of-sample length

—

473

Return, 1 year (client composite)

16.48%

—

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

—

25.61%

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

—

1205%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

—

28.32%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

—

58.90%

Return, since inception (annualized) (client composite)

10.44%

—

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

—

-0.74%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

—

4.47%

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

—

-0.11%

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

—

21.56%

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

—

20.66%

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

—

1.21%

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

—

5.65%

Return, year to date (client composite)

-3.12%

—

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

—

14.13%

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

—

0.55

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

1.12

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

—

-46.77%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

-25.36%

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

—

1.04

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

1.19

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

—

1.51

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

1.77

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

—

24.88%

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

23.31%

Quality

Community review status

—

ACTIVE

Construction

Logic complexity (node count)

—

Rebalance frequency

—

weekly

Rebalancing (methodology text)

Rebalances when a holding drifts about 5% from target (Form ADV)

—

Cost & access

Management / advisory fee

0.25%

—

Minimum investment

$50

—

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

—

Watchers

—

Risk score

Risk profile (SoFi)

Moderately Aggressive

—

Risk profile rank 1-5 (SoFi)

—

Sustainable Moderately Aggressive Allocation (IRA)

Women-Led US Companies Momentum with Volatility Weighting

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Overlap

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Overlap

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources