Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Weekly Grind Pop Bots: S&P, Nasdaq and Semis Sleeves vs Small Cap Dividend Factor US Stocks

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (OOS, Live). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

54.5%Best

19.4%

21.9%Best

6.1%

18.4%

15.1%Best

1.17Best

1.10

-18.1%

-8.1%Best

Fee

—

0.20%

Minimum investment

—

$100

Each source uses its own scale

—

3(1-5 (Interactive Advisors))

Inception

2023-08-13

2016-12-22

Holdings

—

60%

82%Best

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Small Cap Dividend Factor US StocksLiveup 53.0%
S&P 500 ETFup 79.9%

No published history to chart: Weekly Grind Pop Bots: S&P, Nasdaq and Semis Sleeves.

Every published figureShow 77 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

leveraged etfs, mean reversion, momentum rotation, multi-asset, tactical allocation, volatility filter

—

Asset classes / instruments

equities

Composition (ETFs / Stocks / Mixed)

—

STOCKS

Curated collections (Interactive Advisors)

—

Diversified portfolios, Income generating portfolios, Undervalued companies

ESG / responsible flag

—

Smart beta flag

—

Yes

Theme keywords (Interactive Advisors)

—

Dividend yields, Mid-cap, Small-cap

Market-relative

Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.13

—

Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.44

—

Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample)

0.36

—

Returns

Annualized return since inception (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

6.15%

Backtest length

1,866

—

Out-of-sample length

975

—

Return since inception (annualized) (live account)

—

6.10%

Return since inception (cumulative) (live account)

—

79.00%

Return vs the source's benchmark, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

3.98%

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

43.52%

—

Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest)

1354%

—

Return, last 30 days (live account)

—

-5.20%

Return, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

22.01%

Return, last 365 days (live account)

—

19.40%

Return, last 5 years (cumulative) (live account)

—

28.60%

Return, last 90 days (live account)

—

-1.20%

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

21.87%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

115.14%

—

Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample)

0.82%

—

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

1.52%

—

Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample)

2.14%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (backtest)

54.46%

—

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

54.46%

—

Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample)

0.70%

—

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

24.29%

—

Return, year to date (live account)

—

16.70%

SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest)

16.09%

—

Trading activity

Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest)

27.58

—

Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

27.42

—

Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest)

54.93%

—

Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

52.31%

—

Backtest

Backtest final value (from $10,000)

$145k

—

Backtest regulatory fees

$341

—

Backtest slippage cost

$2,510

—

Risk metrics

Beta vs the source's benchmark, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

0.77

Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest)

2.41

—

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.21

—

Maximum drawdown since inception (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

-42.13%

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-18.07%

—

Maximum drawdown, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

-8.09%

Maximum drawdown, last 365 days (live account)

—

-8.10%

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

-18.07%

—

Sharpe ratio since inception (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

0.26

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

1.94

—

Sharpe ratio, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

1.15

Sharpe ratio, last 365 days (live account)

—

1.10

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

1.17

—

Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest)

3.78

—

Sortino ratio, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

1.82

Sortino ratio, last 365 days (live account)

—

1.91

Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

2.23

—

Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest)

19.65%

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

18.41%

—

Value-at-risk 95% 1-week, last 365 days (live account)

—

-3.50%

Volatility since inception (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

22.28%

Volatility, last 365 days (Lighthorse, daily, live)

—

14.38%

Volatility, last 365 days (live account)

—

15.10%

Quality

Community review status

ACTIVE

—

Holdings

Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it)

0.25

—

Construction

Logic complexity (node count)

286

—

Rebalance corridor width

10.00%

—

Rebalance frequency

none

—

Rebalancing (methodology text)

—

rebalances quarterly; rebalanced on a quarterly

Cost & access

Management / advisory fee

—

0.20%

Minimum investment

—

$100

Disclosure

Metrics calculated through

—

2026-10-09

Popularity

Remixes (copies)

—

Watchers

—

Risk score

Risk label (Interactive Advisors)

—

Growth plus

Risk score 1-5 (Interactive Advisors)

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources