Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Daily, it rotates between 2x Coinbase/Bitcoin (whichever is hotter) and 2x/−1.5x NVDA, while hedging with UVXY or shorting tech/semis after overheated pops. Big‑trend checks in SPY vs commodities/bonds gate how aggressive it is.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-19
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
No funds
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
11 of 23 funds in its are : BITX, CONL, FAS, NVDL, NVDS, SOXL, SOXS, SQQQ, TECL, TQQQ, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
It checks the big trend: is the S&P 500 (SPY) beating commodities and above its long‑term average? If yes, risk‑on. Core: rotate into 2x Coinbase (CONL) or 2x Bitcoin (BITX) depending on the last 2 days, but only if Coinbase’s short‑term trend is up. Fallback: if markets are overheated (RSI≈80; a 0–100 speed gauge), buy UVXY (crash hedge). If washed out (RSI≈30), buy 2x NVDA (NVDL), or short NVDA (NVDS) if SPY is below its 200‑day. It can also short tech/semis (SQQQ/SOXS) after big pops. Uses leveraged ETFs (very volatile).
Daily, it rotates between 2x Coinbase/Bitcoin (whichever is hotter) and 2x/−1.5x NVDA, while hedging with UVXY or shorting tech/semis after overheated pops. Big‑trend checks in SPY vs commodities/bonds gate how aggressive it is.
Dynamic crypto/AI/NVDA rotation with volatility hedges aims for out-of-sample alpha; can outperform in trend-led markets but comes with very high drawdowns and volatility vs the S&P 500. Suited for risk-tolerant, alpha-seeking investors.
Copy of FINAL BTC SCRIPT
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $1.3M | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $12k | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $98k | 2026-10-19 |
| AI categories (Composer) | crypto-linked, daily rebalanced, leveraged etfs, momentum rotation, semiconductor/nvda, short-term, tactical, volatility hedge | ||
| Asset classes / instruments | equities |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 211 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "BITX", "COIN", "CONL", "DBC", "FAS", "IEF", "IOO", "NVDL", "NVDS", "QQQ", "SOXL", "SOXS", "SPY", "SQQQ", "TECL", "TQQQ", "UVXY", "VOX", "VTV", "XLF", "XLP", "XLY" ] | 2026-10-19 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.21 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 2.47 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.40 | 2026-10-19 |
| Remixes (copies) | 212 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Watchers | 52 | 2026-10-19 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-19 |
| Backtest length | 829 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 497 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 336.79% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 13k% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 15.82% | ||
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 33.20% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 12.39% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | -9.20% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -3.10% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | -67.49% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | -74.44% | ||
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -13.32% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | -4.59% | ||
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 19.95% | 2026-10-19 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 4.08 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.19 | ||
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -82.45% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -82.46% | ||
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.90 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.30 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.95 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 106.57% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 101.64% |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 89.67 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 84.68 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 51.15% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 48.29% | 2026-10-19 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
