Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Daily tactical rotation using leveraged ETFs. Uses TQQQ’s trend to choose regime. In uptrends it owns the strongest 3x sector; on extremes it hedges with UVXY or buys SOXL on dips. In downtrends it plays oversold bounces or flips to SQQQ or 2x gold (UGL).
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
2.1% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-07-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
12 of 13 funds in its are : CURE, FAS, SOXL, SQQQ, TECL, TQQQ, UGL, UPRO, UPW, UTSL, UVXY, WANT
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
1) Check trend: if a fast Nasdaq fund (TQQQ) sits above its long‑term average, it’s an “uptrend.” Otherwise, “downtrend.”<br>2) Uptrend: usually own the single best‑performing 3x sector (past ~10 days). If things look too hot, briefly buy volatility (UVXY). If very washed out, buy semis (SOXL).<br>3) Downtrend or weak momentum: hunt for oversold bounces; if none, either short the Nasdaq (SQQQ) when downside is strong or hold 2x gold (UGL).<br>4) Rebalance daily.
Daily tactical rotation using leveraged ETFs. Uses TQQQ’s trend to choose regime. In uptrends it owns the strongest 3x sector; on extremes it hedges with UVXY or buys SOXL on dips. In downtrends it plays oversold bounces or flips to SQQQ or 2x gold (UGL).
Out-of-sample, this strategy seeks far higher upside than the S&P by rotating into the strongest 3x sectors with hedges; ~81% annualized, but drawdowns around ~47%. Great for risk-tolerant investors chasing outsized growth.
(Created with Composer AI)
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $1.3B | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $2.9M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $27.7M | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | daily rebalance, gold, inverse etf, leveraged etfs, mean reversion, sector rotation, trend following, volatility hedge | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 93 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BSV", "CURE", "FAS", "SOXL", "SQQQ", "TECL", "TQQQ", "UGL", "UPRO", "UPW", "UTSL", "UVXY", "WANT" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.35 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 2.23 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.43 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 2 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 1 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 1,964 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 223 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 353.12% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 13090k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 81.47% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 69.84% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 2.30% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 22.74% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 4.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 65.55% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 0.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 9.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 27.70% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 16.86% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 7.56 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.74 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -46.74% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -46.74% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.52 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.24 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 4.61 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.84 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 69.33% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 65.57% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 82.25 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 88.14 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 55.04% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 51.57% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
