Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Equal-weight mix of a 3× Nasdaq fund (TQQQ) and seven mega-cap tech/chip stocks. Designed to beat QQQ by concentrating in big tech and adding leverage. Very high risk and volatility; no scheduled rebalancing.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
9 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.1% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
13.2% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
1 of 8 funds in its are : TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
It splits money evenly across eight positions: TQQQ (a fund that tries to move about 3× the daily return of the Nasdaq‑100), plus Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, AMD, Tesla, and Taiwan Semiconductor (the biggest contract chipmaker). No routine rebalancing. It rides big tech and adds a “turbo” via TQQQ—gains and losses are both magnified.
Equal-weight mix of a 3× Nasdaq fund (TQQQ) and seven mega-cap tech/chip stocks. Designed to beat QQQ by concentrating in big tech and adding leverage. Very high risk and volatility; no scheduled rebalancing.
Tech/semiconductor tilted, levered strategy with outsized out-of-sample results: ~59% annualized vs 22% S&P; Sharpe ~1.54 vs 1.38; Calmar ~1.65. Bigger swings (drawdown ~36%), but potential for strong long-run gains.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $2.8M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $24 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $190 | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | buy-and-hold, concentrated tech, leveraged etf, long-only equities, semiconductor-heavy, us large-cap growth | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 13 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 10.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.13 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "AAPL", "AMD", "AMZN", "MSFT", "NVDA", "TQQQ", "TSLA", "TSM" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.11 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.93 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.87 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 93 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 72 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 4,095 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 997 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 41.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 28k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 59.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 531.26% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 0.32% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 8.20% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -0.15% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 42.32% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 41.99% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 0.97% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 9.61% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.18% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.75 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.65 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -55.39% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -35.93% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.24 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.54 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.79 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 2.39 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 32.36% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 34.11% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 1.74 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.88 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 55.87% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 55.97% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
