Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
An adaptive, K‑1‑free “all‑weather” mix that tilts with interest‑rate and volatility signals: levered stocks/bonds when rates fall, defensive sectors/strong USD/inverse funds when rates rise, plus a small commodity sleeve and a crash switch to short‑term Treasuries.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
10 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
7 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
: 3.6% (PDBC 8% × 0.48), shown separately from fossil-fuel companies.
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 92% · 2026-10-11 ()
39.5% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
13 of 32 funds in its are : FAS, QLD, SDS, SOXL, SQQQ, SSO, TECL, TMF, TMV, TQQQ, TYD, TYO, UPRO
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Macro signals label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Starts near 30% stocks, 55% bonds, 15% commodities. If fear spikes (VIXY is “hot”), the stock piece parks in short‑term Treasuries. Otherwise it checks interest‑rate trend. Falling rates: use leveraged stock and bond funds for upside. Rising rates: rotate toward defensive sectors, some funds that rise when stocks or bonds fall, and the US dollar (USDU). Commodities stay as a small, diversified sleeve picked by recent strength. RSI = a short‑term speed/heat score (0–100).
An adaptive, K‑1‑free “all‑weather” mix that tilts with interest‑rate and volatility signals: levered stocks/bonds when rates fall, defensive sectors/strong USD/inverse funds when rates rise, plus a small commodity sleeve and a crash switch to short‑term Treasuries.
Adaptive, K-1‑free, regime‑tilting multi-asset strategy: ~19.5% oos annualized return, ~18% max drawdown, Calmar ~1.08, Sharpe ~1.10. Similar risk to the S&P but with built-in downside protection and rate/volatility tilts for steadier, durable gains.
Ray Dalio's All Weather Portfolio is a great design that intends to maintain exposure to various asset classes to profit in any economic environment. A significant flaw, however, is that it is not capable of handling a rising rates environment, due to the heavy bonds exposure. This symphony is an attempt to maintain the "profit in any environment" nature of the AWP and deploys leverage and shorting to beat the S&P 500 over a long enough time horizon. As a bonus, this strategy is entirely K-1 free. This symphony uses components from the Commander BND strategy by HinnomTX, Beta Baller from Deez, and the volatility switch developed by Garen Phillips.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $97k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $396 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $2,865 | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | bonds, commodities, crash protection, leveraged & inverse etfs, multi-asset, risk-managed, tactical allocation, trend/contrarian, usd tilt | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 79 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 10.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.26 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "BND", "BTAL", "COMT", "FAS", "GLD", "GLTR", "OILK", "PDBC", "QLD", "SDS", "SHY", "SLV", "SOXL", "SQQQ", "SSO", "TECL", "TLT", "TMF", "TMV", "TQQQ", "TYD", "TYO", "UPRO", "USDU", "VGIT", "VGLT", "VIXY", "XLE", "XLF", "XLP", "XLY" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.10 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.48 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.42 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 158 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 74 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 2,516 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 992 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 25.53% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 869.29% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 19.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 101.85% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -0.06% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 3.23% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.56% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 2.38% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 2.39% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 1.18% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 2.69% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.53% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.42 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.08 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -18.04% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -18.04% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.56 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.10 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.28 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 15.31% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 17.59% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 28.96 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 36.93 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 56.20% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 52.52% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
