Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A daily Nasdaq tactic: buy extreme weakness with 3x long (TQQQ), short extreme strength with 3x inverse (SQQQ), and otherwise hold the strongest mega‑cap (AAPL/MSFT/NVDA/TSLA). Uses a simple 0–100 “heat gauge” to time entries.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
No funds
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
0.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
2 of 7 funds in its are : SQQQ, TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
What it trades: QQQ (Nasdaq‑100), TQQQ (3x up), SQQQ (3x down), and sometimes AAPL/MSFT/NVDA/TSLA. RSI is a 0–100 “heat gauge”: below ~31 = very weak; above ~80 = overheated. Daily: - If QQQ fell >6% in 5 days: only buy TQQQ when RSI is very weak; otherwise use SQQQ (or after a >5% TQQQ pop). - If no big drop: short with SQQQ when overheated; buy TQQQ when very weak; else hold the strongest of AAPL/MSFT/NVDA/TSLA.
A daily Nasdaq tactic: buy extreme weakness with 3x long (TQQQ), short extreme strength with 3x inverse (SQQQ), and otherwise hold the strongest mega‑cap (AAPL/MSFT/NVDA/TSLA). Uses a simple 0–100 “heat gauge” to time entries.
Out-of-sample annualized return ~40% vs ~22% for the S&P, driven by 3x QQQ/mega-cap exposure. Higher risk: drawdowns ~52% and Sharpe ~0.95 vs ~1.40, so suited for higher-risk, growth-focused investors.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $643.7M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $2.0M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $19.0M | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | daily rebalanced, leveraged etfs, long/short, momentum and mean reversion, nasdaq-100, rsi-based, tactical, tech-heavy | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 29 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "AAPL", "MSFT", "NVDA", "QQQ", "SQQQ", "TQQQ", "TSLA" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.05 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.86 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.61 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 27 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 4,055 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 724 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 98.96% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 6437k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 40.25% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 164.63% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 2.38% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 6.02% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 3.39% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | -10.12% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | -10.13% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 3.66% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 21.97% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.22% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.92 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.78 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -51.55% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -51.56% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.65 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.95 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.89 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.57 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 48.52% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 46.85% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 39.96 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 47.69 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 53.83% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 52.49% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
