Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A daily rules engine that buys tech/S&P/semis (often via 3x funds) on dips, hedges or moves to safe assets when markets overheat or trend lower, and uses bond and junk‑bond signals to switch between growth and defense to target high return with controlled drawdowns.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
13 positions as of 2026-10-19
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.2% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
8 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31) · : QQQ via QQQM
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 98% · 2026-10-19 ()
12.4% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
9 of 26 funds in its are : PSQ, QLD, SOXL, SPXL, SQQQ, SVXY, TMF, TQQQ, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Macro signals label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Daily, rule‑based. RSI (0–100 heat): >80=too hot → hedge with UVXY. <30=too cold → buy dips in 3x TQQQ/SPXL/SOXL (Nasdaq/S&P/Semis). If trend up (price>200‑day avg), prefer QQQ/SPY/SMH; if down, shift to BIL/SHY (cash/short Treas), GLD (gold), UUP (US$), XLP (staples) or PSQ (short Nasdaq). Often uses 60/40 SPY+bonds; pick TLT vs SHY by bond trend. JNK vs T‑Bills is a ‘canary’ gating risk‑on.
A daily rules engine that buys tech/S&P/semis (often via 3x funds) on dips, hedges or moves to safe assets when markets overheat or trend lower, and uses bond and junk‑bond signals to switch between growth and defense to target high return with controlled drawdowns.
Out-of-sample results show the strategy delivering ~27.36% annualized returns vs ~17.70% for the S&P, with a Calmar ~1.18 and disciplined risk controls (dynamic hedging, regime shifts). Higher upside with proven risk management.
18+ Month OOS CAGR>50% DD<15% JSON < 50KB No BTC
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $29.4M | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $65k | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $568k | 2026-10-19 |
| AI categories (Composer) | leveraged etfs, mean reversion, multi-asset, regime switching, tactical allocation, trend following, volatility hedging | ||
| Asset classes / instruments | equities |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 386 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.19 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "BND", "BSV", "COST", "GLD", "IEF", "JNK", "PSQ", "QLD", "QQQ", "SHY", "SMH", "SOXL", "SPXL", "SPY", "SQQQ", "SVXY", "TLT", "TMF", "TQQQ", "UNH", "UUP", "UVXY", "XLE", "XLP", "XLU" ] | 2026-10-19 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.03 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.36 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.82 | 2026-10-19 |
| Remixes (copies) | 7 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Watchers | 5 | 2026-10-19 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-19 |
| Backtest length | 3,717 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 506 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 71.82% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 294k% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 27.36% | ||
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 61.73% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -3.24% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 2.27% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -2.49% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 19.01% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 22.28% | ||
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -2.85% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 7.15% | ||
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 14.86% | 2026-10-19 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.10 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.18 | ||
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -23.17% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -23.17% | ||
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.17 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 4.48 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.74 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 26.50% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 27.24% |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 32.83 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 34.78 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 58.46% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 55.14% | 2026-10-19 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
