Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A modern, Dragon‑style portfolio that spreads across stocks, bonds, gold/commodities, the U.S. dollar, and crash hedges. It rotates using simple trend, momentum, and overbought/oversold signals—adding risk in uptrends, defending in selloffs.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
17 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.8% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
13 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31) · : SPY via IVV
: 9.0% (DBC 24% × 0.37), shown separately from fossil-fuel companies.
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 96% · 2026-10-11 ()
27.2% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
17 of 43 funds in its are : FAS, PSQ, SDS, SH, SOXL, SOXS, SPXL, SQQQ, SSO, TECL, TMF, TMV, TQQQ, TYD, TYO, UPRO, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Multi-asset label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Goal: stay steady in booms and busts (“Dragon”).<br>Split into 5 sleeves: growth stocks; bonds/rates; cross‑asset trend & momentum; “fiat alternatives” (gold, commodities, U.S. dollar, T‑bills); crash protection (VIX hedges).<br>Signals: trend (vs 200‑day avg), momentum (~4 months), short‑term heat/cold, and recent drops. In calm uptrends it leans into stocks (sometimes 3x tech/semis). In stress or rising rates it shifts to Treasuries, gold/commodities, the dollar, or inverse hedges. Leveraged ETFs are high‑risk.
A modern, Dragon‑style portfolio that spreads across stocks, bonds, gold/commodities, the U.S. dollar, and crash hedges. It rotates using simple trend, momentum, and overbought/oversold signals—adding risk in uptrends, defending in selloffs.
Out-of-sample, the Dragon strategy delivers higher risk-adjusted returns and lower risk than the S&P: about 26% annualized vs 22%, Sharpe ~1.55 vs 1.40, max drawdown ~13.8% vs 18.8%, beta ~0.79, supported by 5 diversified sleeves.
The serpent represents times of growth and stability, the hawk times of change and volatility. And what do you get when you combine a serpent and a hawk? A dragon. This symphony is based on the Artemis Dragon Portfolio, which seeks to perform well both in times of growth and decline by balancing five high-level asset classes. We took some creative license in the implementation of this strategy to leverage the power of Composer and improve on the static ETF approaches currently available to retail investors. The symphony includes the #DEMAMO and #COMMO symphonies. This symphony was inspired by the Artemis Dragon Portfolio and developed by Composer. By choosing to trade this strategy, you understand that the strategy employs ETFs, and that you understand the associated risks of trading, holding, and costs associated with ETFs, and also leveraged ETFs. Before investing in ANY strategy containing an ETF, please review the relevant ETF prospectus.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $823k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $1,978 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $15k | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | bonds, commodities, gold, leveraged etfs, multi-asset, risk-parity, tactical allocation, trend-following, u.s. dollar, volatility hedging | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 347 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 2.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.14 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "BND", "BSV", "BTAL", "DBC", "FAS", "GLD", "IEF", "PSQ", "QQQ", "QUAL", "RPV", "RSP", "SCHD", "SDS", "SH", "SHV", "SHY", "SOXL", "SOXS", "SPXL", "SPY", "SQQQ", "SSO", "TECL", "TLT", "TMF", "TMV", "TQQQ", "TYD", "TYO", "UPRO", "USDU", "UUP", "UVXY", "VGIT", "VGLT", "VIXM", "VIXY", "XLE", "XLF", "XLP", "XLY" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.08 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.79 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.74 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 13 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 14 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 3,200 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 879 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 41.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 8132% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 26.03% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 124.33% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 0.39% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 0.81% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.98% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 11.67% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 11.67% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 0.56% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 7.63% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 13.94% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.02 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.89 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -13.76% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -13.76% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.49 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.55 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 4.14 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 2.47 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 14.37% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 15.77% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 24.58 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 27.38 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 59.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 56.54% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
