Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A daily momentum strategy that flips between 3x long (EDC) or 3x short (EDZ) Emerging Markets using stock‑vs‑bond signals (IEF–IWM or BND–QQQ) plus a TMF regime check, picking the better cue over 90 days and usually keeping a cash buffer.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
2 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-07-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
3 of 8 funds in its are : EDC, EDZ, TMF
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Macro signals label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Each day it chooses between two cues—bonds vs small‑caps (IEF vs IWM) or bonds vs Nasdaq (BND vs QQQ)—whichever worked better over 90 days. RSI = a 0–100 short‑term momentum score; higher = stronger. If S&P 500 (SPY) RSI is very high, it also checks long Treasuries (TMF) RSI to flip the cue. The cue says risk‑on or risk‑off: risk‑on buys EDC (3x EM stocks), risk‑off buys EDZ (3x inverse EM). It typically keeps a cash buffer. 3x funds are very volatile.
A daily momentum strategy that flips between 3x long (EDC) or 3x short (EDZ) Emerging Markets using stock‑vs‑bond signals (IEF–IWM or BND–QQQ) plus a TMF regime check, picking the better cue over 90 days and usually keeping a cash buffer.
High upside potential: oos annualized return 38% vs SPY 21%, with dynamic EM bets and a cash buffer. Expect larger drawdowns (≈60%), but potential for stronger long-run growth than the S&P 500.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $67.0M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $147k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $1.4M | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | daily rebalanced, emerging markets, leveraged etfs, long/short, risk-on/off, tactical momentum | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 65 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1.00 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BND", "EDC", "EDZ", "IEF", "IWM", "QQQ", "SPY", "TMF" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.45 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.31 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.08 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 38 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 10 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 4,294 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 686 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 67.69% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 670k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 38.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 140.64% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -3.08% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 6.22% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 3.58% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 50.19% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 50.15% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 5.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 15.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 14.49% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.85 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.63 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -79.79% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -59.89% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.14 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.83 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.68 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.25 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 63.12% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 61.14% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 36.39 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 42.24 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 52.26% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 50.87% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
