Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Rides big‑tech momentum with TQQQ in uptrends, steps into volatility funds and cash when overheated, and in downtrends pairs mid‑/short‑term volatility—only buying TQQQ on sharp dips. Very high risk and highly tactical.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.5% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 98% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
2 of 5 funds in its are : SVXY, TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Daily it checks TQQQ (a fund that amplifies the Nasdaq‑100 about 3×). If TQQQ is above its 200‑day average (uptrend), it holds TQQQ—unless a short‑term “hot/cold” meter (RSI) says it’s very hot (>80), then it splits 50/50 into VIXY (fear/volatility hedge) and BIL (T‑bills). If below the 200‑day average (downtrend), it splits 50/50 into VIXM (mid‑term fear) and SVXY (anti‑fear)—unless RSI is very cold (<30), then it buys TQQQ for a bounce.
Rides big‑tech momentum with TQQQ in uptrends, steps into volatility funds and cash when overheated, and in downtrends pairs mid‑/short‑term volatility—only buying TQQQ on sharp dips. Very high risk and highly tactical.
Out-of-sample annualized return ~55% vs ~19% for the S&P, driven by a disciplined trend/RSI framework plus volatility hedges. Capture Nasdaq uptrends with leverage and hedges, but expect higher drawdowns and path dependence.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $46.0M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $30k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $274k | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | high risk, leveraged etfs, tactical allocation, trend/momentum, volatility rotation | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 19 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.95 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "SVXY", "TQQQ", "VIXM", "VIXY" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | -0.09 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 3.70 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.86 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 2 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 3 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 3,775 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 291 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 75.56% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 460k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 54.94% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 66.09% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 1.31% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 13.82% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.33% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 41.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 41.50% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 2.11% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 6.68% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.79% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.88 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.64 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -40.11% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -33.60% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.41 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.09 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.12 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 47.99% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 53.25% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 17.29 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 15.59 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 56.93% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 54.98% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
