Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
If GME is heating up, rotate into the 3 strongest crypto-linked names (Coinbase, miners, BTC/ETH ETFs), equal-weighted. If not, hold GME. Uses short-term trend and 15‑day momentum, with a small band to limit trading.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
4 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
2 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 89% · 2026-10-11 ()
33.6% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
2 of 10 funds in its are : BITX, CONL
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
1) Check GameStop (GME) trend: if its 3‑day average price is above its 14‑day average (a short-term upswing), switch to crypto plays.<br>2) When “on,” buy the 3 best 15‑day performers from: COIN=Coinbase; CONL=1.5x Coinbase ETF; RIOT/MARA=bitcoin miners; MSTR=bitcoin‑heavy firm; BITO/BETH/BETE/BITX=bitcoin/ether ETFs. Split money evenly.<br>3) Otherwise, hold GME. A 5% band reduces needless trades.
If GME is heating up, rotate into the 3 strongest crypto-linked names (Coinbase, miners, BTC/ETH ETFs), equal-weighted. If not, hold GME. Uses short-term trend and 15‑day momentum, with a small band to limit trading.
Out-of-sample return 34.64% vs S&P 19.47%—driven by tactical crypto-linked bets on GME-triggered upswings. Calmar 0.689 promises attractive risk-adjusted upside; expect higher drawdowns (~50% vs ~19%), so suitability hinges on risk tolerance.
Gamestop go brr
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $37k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $138 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $905 | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | crypto-linked equities, equal-weight, meme stocks, momentum, moving-average crossover, tactical allocation, trend-following | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 16 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 5.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.66 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BETE", "BETH", "BITO", "BITX", "COIN", "CONL", "GME", "MARA", "MSTR", "RIOT" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.26 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.55 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.34 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 4 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 0 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 743 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 603 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 56.34% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 274.08% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 34.64% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 103.99% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 1.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | -4.73% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -7.18% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | -18.07% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | -18.06% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -11.74% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | -5.90% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 24.73% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.12 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.69 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -50.25% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -50.25% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.96 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.76 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.59 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.25 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 76.87% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 73.10% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 46.87 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 47.82 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 48.59% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 48.42% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
