Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
All‑in, rules‑based swing trading. Uses QQQ’s RSI and moving averages to flip between 3x tech bulls (TQQQ/TECL/SOXL), 3x short (SQQQ), or UVXY when QQQ looks extremely overbought. Concentrated, timing‑heavy, and very high risk.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-07-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 98% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
5 of 6 funds in its are : SOXL, SQQQ, TECL, TQQQ, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
It watches QQQ’s momentum (RSI: a 0–100 “speed-of-move” score; high = stretched up, low = stretched down) and trend (moving averages: average price over X days).<br>- If QQQ is extremely stretched up, it buys UVXY (jumps when fear/vol spikes).<br>- If QQQ is stretched down, it buys one 3x tech bull (TQQQ/TECL/SOXL), choosing the most beaten‑down.<br>- Otherwise, QQQ vs 160/125/30‑day averages decides 3x long vs 3x short (SQQQ). 100% in one ETF. Very high risk.
All‑in, rules‑based swing trading. Uses QQQ’s RSI and moving averages to flip between 3x tech bulls (TQQQ/TECL/SOXL), 3x short (SQQQ), or UVXY when QQQ looks extremely overbought. Concentrated, timing‑heavy, and very high risk.
Out-of-sample edge: ~38.5% annualized return vs ~18% S&P, via a rules-based, 100% single-ETF swing strategy focused on tech and volatility. Higher upside, but larger drawdowns and higher volatility than the S&P.
Gainz!!!
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $30.7B | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $31.1M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $300.4M | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | high risk, leveraged etfs, rsi/mean reversion, tactical timing, tech/nasdaq focus, trend following, volatility trading | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 59 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 10.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "QQQ", "SOXL", "SQQQ", "TECL", "TQQQ", "UVXY" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.23 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 3.44 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.55 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 7 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 6 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 3,775 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 579 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 170.97% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 306819k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 38.54% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 111.76% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -1.94% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 11.11% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -14.63% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 2.15% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 2.14% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -7.72% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | -13.79% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.79% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.56 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.58 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -66.75% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -66.75% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.61 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.83 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.22 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 83.23% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 101.39% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 35.78 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 22.20 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 54.49% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 53.20% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
