Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Daily switches to one ETF: leveraged Microsoft, leveraged Apple, or a bearish 3x tech fund, depending on semiconductor momentum and whether the Nasdaq‑100 had a sharp recent drop.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-07-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
4 of 5 funds in its are : AAPU, MSFU, SOXL, TECS
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Each day it picks one ETF: 1) If semiconductor momentum is soft (SOXL’s 8‑day RSI—speed of recent gains vs losses—is below ~54), buy MSFU (1.5x Microsoft). 2) Otherwise, check QQQ’s worst ~week drop. If under 3.5%, buy AAPU (1.5x Apple). If 3.5%+ down, buy TECS (−3x tech). SOXL=3x semis.
Daily switches to one ETF: leveraged Microsoft, leveraged Apple, or a bearish 3x tech fund, depending on semiconductor momentum and whether the Nasdaq‑100 had a sharp recent drop.
Out-of-sample shows ~32.2% annualized return versus the S&P 500’s ~23.6%, powered by a rules-based, tech-tilted rotation among MSFT, AAPL and -3x Tech. Higher upside when tech leads, but with noticeably higher volatility and drawdowns.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $51k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $116 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $832 | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | daily rebalance, leveraged etfs, momentum, rules-based, tactical allocation, tech sector | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 13 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "AAPU", "MSFU", "QQQ", "SOXL", "TECS" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | -0.01 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.84 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.56 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 5 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 5 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 1,026 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 733 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 49.02% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 408.23% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 32.16% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 125.26% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 4.69% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 14.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 8.87% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 78.33% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 78.34% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 3.97% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 98.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 19.54% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.03 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.68 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -47.47% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -47.47% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.06 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.80 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.69 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.26 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 48.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 50.11% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 39.54 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 39.19 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 52.73% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 52.39% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
