Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
It times Nvidia with leverage using market “heat” and trend. If broad markets look overheated, it hedges with a volatility fund (UVXY). If not, it rides Nvidia (NVDL) unless the long-term trend is down, then it shorts it (NVDS). High risk, concentrated.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-19
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-06-30)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
4 of 8 funds in its are : NVDL, NVDS, TQQQ, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Each day it reads a 10‑day “heat” score (RSI, a 0–100 gauge of recent ups/downs) on big market funds: SPY (S&P 500), IOO (global mega‑caps), TQQQ (leveraged Nasdaq‑100), VTV (value), XLF (financials).<br>- If any score is very hot (>79): buy UVXY, a volatility fund that spikes on selloffs.<br>- Else if TQQQ or SPY is very cold (<30): buy NVDL (2× long Nvidia).<br>- Else: if SPY is above its 200‑day average hold NVDL; otherwise hold NVDS (short Nvidia). Very risky; uses leverage.
It times Nvidia with leverage using market “heat” and trend. If broad markets look overheated, it hedges with a volatility fund (UVXY). If not, it rides Nvidia (NVDL) unless the long-term trend is down, then it shorts it (NVDS). High risk, concentrated.
Bold Nvidia-led, regime-tuned strategy with higher upside than the S&P (about 22% vs 18%), but far larger drawdowns and volatility. Best for aggressive, risk-tolerant investors who can handle swings and leverage-driven alpha.
12/14/2022
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $612k | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $693 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $4,957 | 2026-10-19 |
| AI categories (Composer) | leveraged etfs, market timing, momentum, single-stock etf, tactical asset allocation, trend following, volatility hedge | ||
| Asset classes / instruments | equities |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 34 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "IOO", "NVDL", "NVDS", "SPY", "TQQQ", "UVXY", "VTV", "XLF" ] | 2026-10-19 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.07 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 2.45 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.48 | 2026-10-19 |
| Remixes (copies) | 121 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Watchers | 25 | 2026-10-19 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-19 |
| Backtest length | 964 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 509 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 192.83% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 6021% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 22.17% | ||
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 49.25% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -3.03% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 3.74% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -8.52% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | -18.89% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | -18.88% | ||
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -18.16% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 20.62% | ||
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 19.97% | 2026-10-19 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.42 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.39 | ||
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -56.33% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -56.33% | ||
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.66 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.72 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.86 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 87.21% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 83.94% |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 21.44 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 15.84 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 53.73% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 51.47% | 2026-10-19 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
