Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A daily, rules‑based, high‑risk mix: half actively flips among 3x tech, Treasuries and hedges using Treasury trends and a heat meter (RSI). Half stays in 3x Nasdaq (TQQQ) with brief hedges after spikes or stress. Expect big swings and turnover.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
2 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.3% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
2 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 99% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
20 of 38 funds in its are : CURE, DIG, ERX, HIBL, MVV, QLD, SOXL, SOXS, SPXL, SPXS, SPXU, SQQQ, TECL, TECS, TMF, TMV, TQQQ, UPRO, USD, UVXY
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Two halves, rebalanced daily. 1) “Beta Baller” rotates using two dials: the trend in long Treasuries (TLT) and a heat score (RSI=0–100; high=too hot, low=washed out). It picks 3x Nasdaq/Tech/Semis (TQQQ/TECL/SOXL), 3x Treasuries (TMF/TMV), inverse ETFs (SQQQ/SOXS/TECS) or volatility (VXX); if unsure it parks in T‑Bills (BIL/SHY). 2) “TQQQ minimal” mostly holds TQQQ but briefly hedges with VXX/SQQQ/TLT after spikes or panics.
A daily, rules‑based, high‑risk mix: half actively flips among 3x tech, Treasuries and hedges using Treasury trends and a heat meter (RSI). Half stays in 3x Nasdaq (TQQQ) with brief hedges after spikes or stress. Expect big swings and turnover.
Out-of-sample, this strategy targets far higher upside (66% annualized) vs the S&P 500 (22%), with Calmar ~1.61 and Sharpe ~1.15, plus dynamic hedging. Expect bigger swings and drawdowns, but stronger long-term growth.
Made by /Ken Luu /derecknielsen & V3 is modified by Garen Phillips. V4 by HinnomTX solves the TECL oversold RSI loop of death. V4.1 was .... V4.2 was an (Pareto) * (Pareto) mod by Belcampo69 * tweaked now to no k-1 forms by okhi2u
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $1.5B | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $4.5M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $43.0M | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | leveraged etfs, market timing, mean reversion, tactical asset allocation, trend following, volatility hedging | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 1,326 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.51 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "AGG", "BIL", "CURE", "DBC", "DIG", "EEM", "EFA", "EPI", "ERX", "EWZ", "GLD", "HIBL", "IEF", "IYK", "MVV", "PDBC", "PUI", "QLD", "QQQ", "SHY", "SOXL", "SOXS", "SPXL", "SPXS", "SPXU", "SPY", "SQQQ", "TECL", "TECS", "TLT", "TMF", "TMV", "TQQQ", "UPRO", "USD", "UUP", "UVXY", "VXX" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.26 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.94 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.51 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 7 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 4 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 1,728 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 711 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 470.42% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 15429k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 66.12% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 319.54% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -0.19% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 12.26% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 6.21% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 22.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 22.42% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 8.51% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 32.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 16.03% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 11.43 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.61 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -41.17% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -41.18% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.05 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.15 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 5.90 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.93 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 63.62% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 58.11% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 73.50 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 65.57 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 59.26% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 54.29% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
