Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Daily rules pick between high‑octane growth (often TQQQ/tech) and diversifiers (KMLM, bonds, cash, or volatility hedges). It rides uptrends hard and cuts risk fast when markets overheat or break. High risk, high turnover, broad multi‑asset coverage.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
35 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Top 25 of 35 shown.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
1.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
21 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31) · : QQQ via QQQM
: 0.2% (DBC 0% × 0.37, DBO 0% × 1.00, BOIL 0% × 2.00), shown separately from fossil-fuel companies.
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 94% · 2026-10-11 ()
65.5% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
41 of 138 funds in its are : AGQ, BOIL, CURE, DIG, DRIP, DUG, EDC, EDZ, ERX, ERY, FAS, FAZ, KOLD, LABD, LABU, PSQ, QLD, RETL, SH, SMN, SOXL, SOXS, SPXL, SPXS, SPXU, SQQQ, SVXY, TBF, TBT, TBX, TECL, TECS, TMF, TMV, TQQQ, TYO, UCO, UGL, UPRO, UVXY, UYM
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
- Each day it decides: offense or defense.<br>- Offense: own what’s trending up the most (often tech via TQQQ/TECL/SOXL, sometimes energy/commodities).<br>- If markets look overheated or roll over, it flips to defense: Treasuries (TMF/TMV), cash-like T‑bills (BIL/SHV/SHY), volatility hedges (UVXY/VIXY), or simple shorts (PSQ/SH).<br>- A mini-module picks TQQQ or KMLM (a managed‑futures ETF) based on which looks stronger.
Daily rules pick between high‑octane growth (often TQQQ/tech) and diversifiers (KMLM, bonds, cash, or volatility hedges). It rides uptrends hard and cuts risk fast when markets overheat or break. High risk, high turnover, broad multi‑asset coverage.
Out-of-sample: ~47.5% annualized returns, Calmar ~2.08, Sharpe ~1.26 vs SPY ~1.17. Dynamic offense/defense rotation aims for bigger upside than the S&P with disciplined hedges, though drawdowns can be larger.
Added two symphs at end.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $1.6M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $4,008 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $32k | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | bonds, commodities, daily rebalancing, leveraged etfs, momentum/trend, tactical multi-asset rotation, volatility hedging | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 5,972 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.17 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "AAPL", "ADBE", "AGG", "AGQ", "AMD", "AMGN", "AMZN", "AVGO", "AXP", "BA", "BIL", "BND", "BOIL", "BRK/B", "BSV", "BTAL", "CAT", "CORP", "COST", "CPER", "CRM", "CSCO", "CURE", "DBA", "DBB", "DBC", "DBE", "DBO", "DIA", "DIG", "DJP", "DRIP", "DUG", "EDC", "EDZ", "EEM", "ERX", "ERY", "FAN", "FAS", "FAZ", "FCG", "GE", "GLD", "GOOG", "GOOGL", "GS", "GSY", "HD", "HON", "HYG", "ICLN", "IEF", "IEI", "IOO", "IWM", "IXN", "IYY", "JNJ", "JPM", "KMLM", "KOLD", "LABD", "LABU", "LLY", "MCD", "META", "MSFT", "NFLX", "NVDA", "NVO", "PDBC", "PEP", "PGR", "PSQ", "QLD", "QQQ", "RETL", "SH", "SHV", "SHY", "SLV", "SMH", "SMN", "SOXL", "SOXS", "SOXX", "SPHB", "SPLV", "SPXL", "SPXS", "SPXU", "SPY", "SQQQ", "STIP", "SVXY", "TAN", "TBF", "TBT", "TBX", "TECL", "TECS", "TLT", "TMF", "TMV", "TQQQ", "TRV", "TSLA", "TYO", "UCO", "UGL", "UNG", "UNH", "UPRO", "URA", "USO", "UUP", "UVXY", "UYM", "V", "VCSH", "VIXM", "VIXY", "VOX", "VPU", "VTI", "VTV", "WOOD", "WTMF", "XLE", "XLF", "XLI", "XLK", "XLP", "XLU", "XME", "XOM", "XOP" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.18 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.43 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.66 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 41 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 17 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 1,455 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 527 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 140.96% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 16k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 47.49% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 125.72% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -0.11% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 0.15% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.67% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 29.24% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 29.23% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 0.14% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 22.01% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 15.41% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 6.18 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 2.08 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -22.81% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -22.81% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.25 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.26 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 6.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 2.40 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 28.32% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 35.51% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 51.59 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 50.66 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 61.86% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 58.25% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
