Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Rules-based NVIDIA switcher. If NVDA lags QQQ across 1–3 days, buy NVDA (use NVDX if NVDA’s short-term strength, via RSI, beats KMLM). If NVDA leads across 1–3 days, hold NVDX only when that strength test passes; otherwise park in T‑bills (BIL).
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
“otherwise sit in BIL (1–3mo T‑Bills)”
“NVDX (2× NVDA ETF)”
“If NVDA led on all three, ride with NVDX only if that RSI test passes”
“If NVDA trailed on all three, it bets on a bounce: buy NVDA, or use NVDX (2× NVDA ETF) if NVDA’s RSI—a 0–100 recent‑momentum score—is higher than KMLM’s”
“Each day it asks whether NVDA (NVIDIA) beat QQQ (Nasdaq‑100 ETF) over 1, 2, and 3 days.”
2 positions as of 2026-10-19
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-06-30)
No stated fossil-fuel rule; the exposure is shown for reference. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
0.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
A stated rule exists, but the holdings neither clearly back it up nor contradict it (for example, out of that asset right now). : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
1 of 5 funds in its are : NVDX
Its stated rules make a claim, and its holdings back it up. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
2 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Each day it asks whether NVDA (NVIDIA) beat QQQ (Nasdaq‑100 ETF) over 1, 2, and 3 days.<br>If NVDA trailed on all three, it bets on a bounce: buy NVDA, or use NVDX (2× NVDA ETF) if NVDA’s RSI—a 0–100 recent‑momentum score—is higher than KMLM’s (a managed‑futures trend ETF).<br>If NVDA led on all three, ride with NVDX only if that RSI test passes; otherwise sit in BIL (1–3mo T‑Bills). If any test fails, hold BIL.
Rules-based NVIDIA switcher. If NVDA lags QQQ across 1–3 days, buy NVDA (use NVDX if NVDA’s short-term strength, via RSI, beats KMLM). If NVDA leads across 1–3 days, hold NVDX only when that strength test passes; otherwise park in T‑bills (BIL).
Disciplined NVDA-led strategy with regime-switch to NVDX or cash, driven by 1-3 day momentum vs QQQ and RSI checks. OOS: ~16.4% annualized vs S&P ~17.7%; max drawdown ~47.8% vs ~18.8%. Prospective tech-cycle upside with risk discipline.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $159k | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $1,289 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $9,485 | 2026-10-19 |
| AI categories (Composer) | cash/t-bills, leveraged etfs, mean reversion, momentum, nvda vs qqq, risk-on/risk-off, tech/semiconductors | ||
| Asset classes / instruments | equities |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 32 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 10.00% | ||
| Rebalance frequency | none |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1.00 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "KMLM", "NVDA", "NVDX", "QQQ" ] | 2026-10-19 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | -0.03 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.89 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.56 | 2026-10-19 |
| Remixes (copies) | 21 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Watchers | 11 | 2026-10-19 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-19 |
| Backtest length | 751 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 516 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 152.71% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 1490% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 16.41% | ||
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 36.08% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -1.45% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | -2.90% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -0.51% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | -0.34% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | -7.50% | ||
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -2.25% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | -9.01% | ||
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 23.20% | 2026-10-19 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.20 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.34 | ||
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -47.76% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -47.76% | ||
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.87 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 3.29 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.83 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 58.38% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 55.05% |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 123.15 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 126.00 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 53.66% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 48.64% | 2026-10-19 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
