Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Core QQQ plus a small, conditional turbo: 80% in QQQ; 20% flips between TQQQ for extra upside in calm markets and short‑term bonds in stress. Effective exposure ≈140% QQQ when risk‑on, ~80% QQQ when risk‑off.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
2 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.5% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
2 funds (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31) · : QQQ via QQQM
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 96% · 2026-10-11 ()
20.6% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
1 of 5 funds in its are : TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Two sleeves: 1) 80% stays in QQQ (the Nasdaq‑100 fund of big tech names). 2) 20% is a switch: if the S&P 500’s recent 1‑month drop is smaller than its worst 9‑month drop and QQQ’s ~4‑year return isn’t worse than −5%, buy TQQQ (targets 3× QQQ’s daily move). Otherwise hold SHY/VCSH (short‑term bonds).
Core QQQ plus a small, conditional turbo: 80% in QQQ; 20% flips between TQQQ for extra upside in calm markets and short‑term bonds in stress. Effective exposure ≈140% QQQ when risk‑on, ~80% QQQ when risk‑off.
Out-of-sample return: 32.29% vs 22.16% for the S&P; Calmar ~1.02; Sharpe ~1.12. Nasdaq-100 core with a 20% turbo in rallies and a risk-off bond sleeve—higher upside, with built-in risk controls vs the S&P.
Strategy from the article at https://seekingalpha.com/article/4307308-tqqq-mastering-art-of-leverage
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $505k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $21 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $122 | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | growth/tech tilt, leveraged overlay, nasdaq‑100, short‑term bonds, tactical risk filter, us equities | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 15 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 8.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.65 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "QQQ", "SHY", "SPY", "TQQQ", "VCSH" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | -0.05 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.75 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.94 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 4 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 2 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 4,190 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 721 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 26.59% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 4947% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 32.29% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 122.93% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 0.66% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 6.72% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.25% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 30.02% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 30.02% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | 1.16% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 4.53% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 14.62% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.56 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.02 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -47.58% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -31.70% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.99 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.12 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.41 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.63 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 27.80% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 28.64% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 0.98 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.07 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 55.94% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 57.00% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
