Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
A daily tactical switcher among 3x long Nasdaq (TQQQ), 3x short Nasdaq (SQQQ), or cash-like T‑bills (BIL), driven by a 100‑day S&P 500 trend check and short‑term momentum (RSI) of bonds vs cash and high‑beta stocks.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
2 positions as of 2026-10-19
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.5% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 98% · 2026-10-19 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-19 ()
3 of 7 funds in its are : SQQQ, TMF, TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Aggressive risk label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
It switches daily among: - TQQQ: 3x long Nasdaq‑100 - SQQQ: 3x short Nasdaq‑100 - BIL: T‑bills (cash‑like) Logic: 1) If the S&P 500 (SPY) is above its 100‑day average, buy TQQQ. 2) If below: use RSI (a 0–100 “hot/cold” score) to compare bonds vs cash and bonds vs high‑beta stocks: - Bonds strong + stocks not washed out → TQQQ - Stocks very washed out → BIL - Bonds weak vs high‑beta → SQQQ
A daily tactical switcher among 3x long Nasdaq (TQQQ), 3x short Nasdaq (SQQQ), or cash-like T‑bills (BIL), driven by a 100‑day S&P 500 trend check and short‑term momentum (RSI) of bonds vs cash and high‑beta stocks.
Aim for higher long-term growth: out-of-sample annualized return 21.0% vs SPY's 18.8%, with risk-managed, trend-following shifts among 3x Nasdaq, 3x SQQQ, or cash. Strong upside in rallies, but prepare for larger drawdowns in severe downturns.
Tactical Combat Casulty Care | If you take out the half and half last section from the v1.21 and go full YOLO with the SMH for the long term to keep the bot all semiconductor focused. Drawdown increased but massive gains increase as well. V2.1 tune up by HinnomTX (2201% to 4615% from 12/2019)
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $778k | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $153 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $1,141 | 2026-10-19 |
| AI categories (Composer) | daily rebalancing, leveraged etfs, momentum, nasdaq-100, risk management, tactical asset allocation, trend-following | ||
| Asset classes / instruments | equities |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 21 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Rebalance frequency | daily |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 1 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "BIL", "SBND", "SPHB", "SPY", "SQQQ", "TMF", "TQQQ" ] | 2026-10-19 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | -0.00 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.96 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.49 | 2026-10-19 |
| Remixes (copies) | 2 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Watchers | 4 | 2026-10-19 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-19 |
| Backtest length | 1,264 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 590 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 138.05% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 7676% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 21.05% | ||
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 55.81% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | -7.60% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | 13.82% | ||
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | -11.27% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 102.23% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 131.49% | ||
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -15.01% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | 6.68% | ||
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 13.55% | 2026-10-19 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.87 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.29 | ||
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -73.66% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -73.66% | ||
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.63 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 2.40 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 0.70 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 67.82% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 64.28% |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 13.56 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 3.42 | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 56.17% | 2026-10-19 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 56.78% | 2026-10-19 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
