Composer · investment strategy
by Composer Technologies · via Composer
Tactical switcher on the tech‑heavy Nasdaq‑100: flips between bullish TQQQ and bearish PSQ by comparing bond (IEF) vs inverse‑Nasdaq momentum (RSI). Then picks how aggressive based on the mix that just pulled back most. High risk.
Description from Composer
of the return and risk figures:as the source publishes them
What $10,000 would have become, from the strategy's own published history, against the S&P 500 over the same dates. The basis is labelled.
This strategy doesn’t publish a performance history we can chart.
Each rule is quoted word for word from the strategy's own documents.
No rules extracted from this strategy’s text yet.
1 positions as of 2026-10-11
: the platform's backtest holdings, not a client account.
Compares the stated rules with the holdings (or, where none are published, a mix estimated from returns), using tests fixed before any results were seen.
0.0% of weight in (IVV: 3.0%)
1 fund (SEC N-PORT, as of 2026-05-31)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
100.0% of weight in (SPY: 0%)
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100% · 2026-10-11 ()
2 of 3 funds in its are : PSQ, TQQQ
This strategy’s rules haven’t been extracted yet, so there’s no claim to compare with. The measurement is still shown. : 100%
Strategies that share its Macro signals label, from other sources first, strongest risk-adjusted return first.
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
How much of what we look for this strategy has, and why anything is missing. Fields that don't apply to it aren't counted.
4 missing
The text the rules are quoted from, with where it came from.
Tickers: TQQQ = 3x up bet on the Nasdaq‑100 (big tech). PSQ = 1x inverse of the Nasdaq‑100 (rises when it falls). IEF = 7–10yr U.S. Treasuries. RSI = a 0–100 score of recent ups vs downs.<br>Each period: compare 10‑day RSI of IEF to 20‑day RSI of PSQ. If IEF>PSQ, pick a TQQQ‑heavy mix; else a PSQ‑heavy mix. From four preset mixes (incl. 100% TQQQ or 100% PSQ), choose the one with the lowest 5‑day RSI and invest 100% there. Trade only if the pick changes or drifts >1%.
Tactical switcher on the tech‑heavy Nasdaq‑100: flips between bullish TQQQ and bearish PSQ by comparing bond (IEF) vs inverse‑Nasdaq momentum (RSI). Then picks how aggressive based on the mix that just pulled back most. High risk.
Out-of-sample: ~52% annualized return vs S&P 500 ~23%, Calmar ~1.09. A regime-switching, RSI-mean-reversion Nasdaq-100 strategy targets big tech upside with disciplined risk—though drawdowns can be larger in stress.
Every value on file, each labelled with its calculation basis and as-of date.
| Backtest final value (from $10,000) | $7.8M | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest regulatory fees | $15k | 2026-10-11 | |
| Backtest slippage cost | $120k | 2026-10-11 |
| AI categories (Composer) | high risk, inverse etf, leveraged etf, mean reversion, momentum (rsi), nasdaq-100, regime switching, tactical allocation | 2026-10-11 | |
| Asset classes / instruments | equities | 2026-10-11 |
| Logic complexity (node count) | 36 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance corridor width | 1.00% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Rebalance frequency | none | 2026-10-11 |
| Concentration (Herfindahl index, out-of-sample, as Composer reports it) | 0.91 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Ticker universe (assets the logic can hold) | show[ "IEF", "PSQ", "TQQQ" ] | 2026-10-11 |
| Alpha vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.13 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Beta vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 1.79 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Correlation (R) vs SPY, out-of-sample (out-of-sample) | 0.61 | 2026-10-11 |
| Remixes (copies) | 34 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Watchers | 15 | 2026-10-11 |
| Community review status | ACTIVE | 2026-10-11 |
| Backtest length | 4,185 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Out-of-sample length | 748 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest) | 49.30% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, backtest period (cumulative) (backtest) | 78k% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample) | 52.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample) | 250.23% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 day (out-of-sample) | 0.10% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample) | -0.87% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 week (out-of-sample) | 0.38% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (backtest) | 29.05% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample) | 29.03% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 2 weeks (out-of-sample) | -0.11% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample) | -11.18% | 2026-10-11 | |
| SPY annualized return over the backtest window (backtest) | 14.45% | 2026-10-11 |
| Calmar ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 0.82 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.09 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest) | -59.92% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | -48.30% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.11 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.17 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, backtest period (backtest) | 1.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Sortino ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 1.60 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, backtest period (backtest) | 45.46% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 44.70% | 2026-10-11 |
| Annualized turnover, backtest period (backtest) | 30.50 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Annualized turnover, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 29.42 | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, backtest period (backtest) | 54.70% | 2026-10-11 | |
| Daily win rate, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample) | 56.68% | 2026-10-11 |
Composer Technologies · Composer
Composer Technologies · Composer
